FW00 — Model Fieldwork Data Record

This model demonstrates the required organization and documentation quality. Its observations are illustrative; actual submissions must use the group's original, unaltered field records.

I — Project Details

ItemRecord
Fieldwork / ProjectFW00 — Orientation; model horizontal-distance field record
LocationUniversity Campus — Open Field
Date / TimeSeptember 3, 2026; 1:00–4:00 PM
Group / SectionGroup 1 / CE Surveying
Survey TypeHorizontal Distance Measurement
Weather / GroundPartly cloudy; dry; slight longitudinal slope
Control ReferenceAssumed local coordinate system
Safety ConditionActive pedestrian crossing through the work area

II — Survey Team and Equipment Used

A — Survey Team

MemberAssignment / DescriptionRemarks
Student AParty ChiefNone
Student BHead Tape PersonNone
Student CRear Tape PersonNone
Student DRecorderNone
Student ERanging / Station MarkingAbsent; Student F reassigned
Student FSafety Observer / Ranging AssistantIncomplete PPE at roll call; corrected before fieldwork

B — Equipment Used

Equipment / InstrumentID / DescriptionQuantityRemarks
Steel TapeST-04; 30 m graduated tape1Serviceable
Ranging RodRR-031Serviceable
Ranging RodRR-071Serviceable
Plumb BobPB-021Serviceable
PPE SetHigh-visibility vest and closed shoes5 active setsVerified before measurement

III — Project Sketch and Photo Documentation

A — Project Sketch

FW00 — High-Accuracy Field Sketch

B — Google Maps Location Points

Point / AreaMap RecordPurpose / Limitation
Survey work areaVerified Google Maps pin and WGS84 coordinates required in the actual submissionGeographic context only; not survey control
ST-01, TP-01, ST-02Assumed local coordinates listed in Section IVEngineering record; not geodetic or cadastral coordinates

No fictional map pin is assigned to this illustrative dataset. The actual group report must insert the verified work-area link and coordinates captured at the site.

C — Photo Documentation — Dedicated Page

Reserve one complete report page for the embedded original images and captions represented by this register.

PhotoImage FileDescription
1FW00-photo-01.jpgPre-field briefing, PPE inspection, and assignment of team roles
2FW00-photo-02.jpgEstablished stations, ranged survey line, and controlled pedestrian crossing
3FW00-photo-03.jpgTape alignment and observation recording at the intermediate point
4FW00-photo-04.jpgCompleted field notes with the sketch and station identifiers visible

IV — Observations and Data

A — Station Control

PointEasting (m)Northing (m)Description
ST-011000.0001000.000Start station
TP-011027.4391000.000Intermediate tape point
ST-021046.1631000.000End station

B — Raw Observations

RunST-01 to TP-01 (m)TP-01 to ST-02 (m)Total (m)Status
127.43818.72646.164Raw / retained
227.44118.72146.162Raw / retained

C — Computed Data and Completion Record

QuantityResult
Mean distance46.163 m
Repeat discrepancy0.002 m
Relative agreementapproximately 1:23,100
RequirementStatus
Project and team identificationComplete
Instrument identificationComplete
Unique station IDsComplete
Raw observations retainedComplete
Units and field sketch shownComplete
Site conditions and preliminary QA/QC documentedComplete

V — Computations and Assumptions

Mean distance:

D‾=46.164+46.1622=46.163 m\overline{D}=\frac{46.164+46.162}{2}=46.163\text{ m}

Repeat discrepancy and relative agreement:

ΔD=∣46.164−46.162∣=0.002 m\Delta D=|46.164-46.162|=0.002\text{ m} Relative agreement=46.1630.002=23,081.5≈1:23,100\text{Relative agreement}=\frac{46.163}{0.002}=23{,}081.5\approx 1:23{,}100

Assumptions and limitations:

  • Coordinates are an assumed local reference and are not geodetic or cadastral.
  • Both raw runs are retained; neither reading replaces the other.
  • The result is a repeatability check only. Activity-specific tape corrections and tolerances remain separate requirements.
  • Values are rounded to the precision supported by the recorded observations.

VI — Remarks and Conclusions

A — Remarks

  • Measurement was suspended whenever pedestrians approached the tape.
  • Student E was absent, so Student F was reassigned after the safety role remained covered.
  • The incomplete PPE condition was corrected before active fieldwork began.
  • No raw reading was erased or overwritten.
  • The active crossing and slight slope are probable sources of setup and alignment error.

B — Conclusion

The two independent runs produced a mean measured distance of 46.163 m, a repeat discrepancy of 0.002 m, and approximate relative agreement of 1:23,100. The record demonstrates the required traceability, safety documentation, and six-section Fieldwork output structure.

Example filename: `G#1-P#0-Fieldwork Orientation.pdf`

Timing: Fieldwork Data is submitted within the scheduled 3-hour class period. The Full Fieldwork Report is submitted on the next meeting using the same source observations.

PrevNext